in

The Cyber Defense Index 2022/23


Overall rating

Pillars

Comparative

The general rankings tab reveals the efficiency of the examined
economies relative to at least one one other and aggregates their scores
throughout 4 pillars: essential infrastructure, cybersecurity
sources, organizational capability, and coverage dedication.

This pillar signifies how properly every nation is served by
strong and safe digital and telecommunications networks and
computing sources that underpin major financial exercise.
In addition to an general indicator of telecom capability, as
assessed by the UN, these metrics incorporate the nation’s
variety of knowledge facilities and safe servers. This pillar additionally
consists of indicators derived from our international survey by which
respondents assessed the robustness of every nation’s essential
infrastructure.

This pillar collects a number of views of the technological and
authorized enforcement “belongings” in every nation that forestall
improper entry and use of information. These embody the ITU’s
holistic evaluation of cybersecurity capabilities, our personal
rating of digital privateness protections, and survey
respondents’ views on how properly cybersecurity instruments and
infrastructure are utilized of their market.

This pillar measures the relative cybersecurity maturity and
digital expertise of the nation’s companies and
establishments. This features a measure of digital participation
in authorities the extent to which organizations are acquainted
with synthetic intelligence, and survey respondents’
assessments of the diploma to which cybersecurity capabilities
are strategic and formally built-in of their organizations.

This pillar measures the comprehensiveness, high quality, and
efficacy of a rustic’s regulatory atmosphere in enhancing
and selling resilient cybersecurity practices. This measure
incorporates the World Bank’s analysis of the federal government’s
effectiveness and the standard of its cybersecurity regulation,
in addition to survey respondents’ assessments of the robustness
and completeness of that regulation.

Get entry to expertise journalism that issues.

MIT Technology Review provides in-depth reporting on immediately’s most
vital applied sciences to arrange you for what’s coming subsequent.

Subscribe today

Back

Experts

MIT Technology Review Insights wish to thank the next
knowledgeable commentators for his or her time and insights:

  • Magda Chelly, Senior Cybersecurity Expert, Founder of Women on
    Cyber, and Co-Founder of Responsible Cyber, Singapore
  • Michael Henri Coden, Co-Founder and Associate Director at
    Cybersecurity, MIT Sloan (CAMS), and Senior Advisor at BCG
    Platinion, United States
  • Sadie Creese, Director, Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre, and
    Professor of Cybersecurity, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Terry Cutler, Creator of the Fraudster Mobile App, Cybersecurity
    Expert, and Founder and CEO of Cyology Labs, Canada
  • Alexander Klimburg, Head of the Centre for Cybersecurity, World
    Economic Forum, Austria
  • Manion Le Blanc, Head of International Cyber Policy Sector,
    Security and Defence Policy Division, European External Action
    Service, Brussels
  • Clay Lin, Director World Bank Information and Technology
    Solutions, and Chief Information Security Officer, United States
  • Andrew W. Lo, Professor of Finance, Director, MIT Laboratory for
    Financial Engineering, United States
  • Andrew Milroy, Cybersecurity Advisor, Founder of Veqtor8,
    Singapore
  • Taylor Reynolds, Technology Policy Director, MIT Internet Policy
    Research Initiative, United States
  • Denis Robitaille, World Bank Group Vice President, Information and
    Technology Solutions, and WBG Chief Information Officer, United
    States
  • Daniel Weitzner, Founding Director, MIT Internet Policy Research
    Initiative, United States
  • Yufei Wu, Professor, Centre for Information and Communication
    Technology, University of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of
    Trinidad and Tobago
Back

About

Methodology: The Cyber Defense Index 2022/23

The MIT Technology Review Insights Cyber Defense Index charges and
ranks the world’s largest and most digitally-forward economies’
functionality to arrange in opposition to and reply and recuperate from
cybersecurity threats. It assesses 20 of the world’s main economies
(largely members of the G20 discussion board, excluding Russia and including
Poland) in keeping with how properly their establishments have adopted
expertise and digital practices to be resilient in opposition to
cyberattacks and the way properly governments and coverage frameworks promote
safe digital transactions.

The Index was developed by combining two broad units of enter knowledge:

  • Secondary supply knowledge, together with international digital expertise
    adoption statistics and coverage and regulatory knowledge, largely
    sourced from worldwide establishments and benchmarks.
  • A world survey of 1000 senior executives (with an equal variety of
    respondents from every nation ranked within the Index) who’ve
    cybersecurity duties for his or her respective organizations.
    Forty-three % of respondents had been CIOs, CTOs, or chief
    safety officers. Respondents had been requested to charge the
    effectiveness of expertise adoption and coverage and regulation
    formation, and of their very own cybersecurity actions, in addition to
    to touch upon their expertise improvement priorities over the
    subsequent two to 3 years.

Both units of information knowledgeable a sequence of indicators—lists of
qualitative and quantitative components—which had been then chosen,
populated, and arranged into 4 pillars. Data from secondary
sources was transformed into scores. This was achieved for the indications
sourced from survey responses as properly, the place every nation’s
responses had been ranked in keeping with their variance from the worldwide
imply.

The use of survey knowledge within the CDI is meant to offer “boots on
the bottom” assessments of the present working circumstances for
sustaining cybersecure environments. This is just like the best way
buying manager indexes or enterprise confidence indexes
incorporate the views of execs on their very own (or their
nation’s) relative efficiency.

The indicator knowledge was subjected to development evaluation, knowledgeable by
major analysis interviews with international cybersecurity professionals,
expertise builders, analysts, and policymakers. This was
complemented by a consultative peer-review course of with
cybersecurity expertise analysts. Based on these inputs, weighting
assumptions had been assigned to find out the relative significance with
which every indicator and pillar influenced a rustic’s cybersecurity
posture.

The 4 pillars of the CDI are:

This pillar signifies how properly every nation is served by strong
and safe digital and telecommunications networks and computing
sources that underpin major financial exercise. In addition
to an general indicator of telecom capability, as assessed by the
UN, these metrics incorporate the nation’s variety of knowledge
facilities and safe servers. This pillar additionally consists of indicators
derived from our international survey by which respondents assessed the
robustness of every nation’s essential infrastructure. This
pillar’s indicators collectively symbolize 30% of the CDI’s
rating.

This pillar collects a number of views of the technological and
authorized enforcement “belongings” in every nation that forestall improper
entry and use of information. These embody the ITU’s holistic
evaluation of cybersecurity capabilities, our personal rating of
digital privateness protections, and survey respondents’ views on
how properly cybersecurity instruments and infrastructure are utilized in
their market. At 35%, this pillar contributes the biggest
portion of the Index’s rating.

This pillar measures the relative cybersecurity maturity and
digital expertise of the nation’s companies and establishments.
This features a measure of digital participation in authorities
the extent to which organizations are aware of synthetic
intelligence, and survey respondents’ assessments of the diploma
to which cybersecurity capabilities are strategic and formally
built-in into their organizations. This pillar accounts for
20% of the general rating.

This pillar measures the comprehensiveness, high quality, and
efficacy of a rustic’s regulatory atmosphere in enhancing and
selling resilient cybersecurity practices. This measure
incorporates the World Bank’s analysis of the federal government’s
effectiveness and the standard of its cybersecurity regulation,
in addition to survey respondents’ assessments of the robustness and
completeness of that regulation. This pillar accounts for 15% of
the general rating.

About Us

MIT Technology Review was based on the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology in 1899.

MIT Technology Review Insights is the customized publishing division of
MIT Technology Review. We conduct qualitative and quantitative
analysis and evaluation worldwide and publish all kinds of
content material, together with articles, stories, infographics, movies, and
podcasts.

If you have got any feedback or queries, please
get in touch.

Report

Comments

Express your views here

Disqus Shortname not set. Please check settings

Board and Batten Siding: Ultimate 101 Guides to Know

Hatman killer video pretend, was a promotional marketing campaign for Tusshar Kapoor’s Maarich