EGN NEWS DESK
Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 226 Filed 08/27/24 Page 14 of 36
34.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Defendant responded, “I do not care a couple of hyperlink, I do not want it. I’ve a
a lot, [Georgia Secretary of State], I’ve a significantly better hyperlink.”
The Defendant requested about rumors that paper ballots forged within the election
had been being destroyed, and the Georgia Secretary of State’s Counsel
defined to him that the declare had been investigated and was not true.
The Defendant claimed that 5,000 dead individuals voted in Georgia, inflicting
the Georgia Secretary of State to reply, “Well, Mr. President, the
problem that you’ve is the information you might have is fallacious. . . . The precise
quantity had been two. Two. Two those who had been dead that voted. And so
[your information]’s fallacious, that was two.”
The Defendant claimed that hundreds of out-of-state voters had forged ballots
in Georgia’s election, which the Georgia Secretary of State’s Counsel
refuted, explaining, “We’ve been going by means of every of these as nicely, and
these numbers that we received, that [Defendant’s counsel] was simply saying,
they are not correct. Every one we have been by means of are those who lived
in Georgia, moved to a distinct state, however then moved again to Georgia
legitimately… they moved again in years in the past. This was not like one thing
simply earlier than the election.”
In response to a number of different of the Defendant’s allegations, the Georgia
Secretary of State’s Counsel advised the Defendant that the Georgia Bureau of
Investigation was inspecting all such claims and discovering no benefit to them.
The Defendant stated that he wanted to “discover” 11,780 votes, and insinuated
that the Georgia Secretary of State and his Counsel may very well be topic to
prison prosecution in the event that they failed to search out election fraud as he demanded,
stating, “And you’re going to discover that they are-which is completely unlawful—
it is, it is, it is extra unlawful for you than it’s for them as a result of you realize what
they did and you are not reporting it. That’s a prison, you realize, that is a
prison offense. And you realize, you possibly can’t let that occur. That’s an enormous
danger to you and to [the Georgia Secretary of State’s Counsel], your lawyer.”
The subsequent day, on January 3, the Defendant falsely claimed that the Georgia
Secretary of State had not addressed the Defendant’s allegations, publicly stating that the Georgia
Secretary of State “was unwilling, or unable, to reply questions such because the ‘ballots underneath desk’
rip-off, poll destruction, out of state ‘voters’, dead voters, and extra. He has no clue!”
– 14 –
