Admin
No cheers for Mayor Eric Adams and Gov. Kathy Hochul’s “shared vision” for a post-COVID-19 New York City, which they touted at an Association for a Better New York occasion this week.
Their evaluation of the town’s present troubled financial scenario under-plays essentially the most vital subject: unchecked crime. Their prescriptions for change are imprecise, quixotic and largely toothless. And although it’s good to know they’re (supposedly) on the identical web page about not soaking the wealthy with extra taxes, a lot of the different pages they share are fallacious.
They relied on a report titled “Making New York Work For Everyone,” reflecting the efforts of the “New New York” panel they’d arrange in May. The report’s themes embody ever-popular bromides, “Reimagine New York’s Commercial Districts as Vibrant 24/7 Destinations” and “Working for an Equitable Future.”
Those aren’t formulation for progress, however slogans for a woke future with out automobiles and for incremental redistribution of wealth.
The report overstated injury from the work-from-home phenomenon, which has left some workplace buildings half empty or worse and damage shops and eating places that relied on heavy workplace site visitors.
“Let’s make Midtown extra enjoyable for workplace employees” was, to paraphrase, one thrust of the report — i.e., create extra pedestrian-only plazas round Grand Central Terminal and automate trash assortment in different cities.
Where to start out slicing this baloney?
While fewer staff work of their places of work than earlier than the pandemic, the numbers Hochul and Adams relied on have been considerably exaggerated. Hochul mused, “Take the identical constructing that’s 40 % full . . . Can folks stay there? Can there be a childcare middle there? Can there be a pleasant restaurant? Can we’ve got a co-working house? Can we . . . have a tech hub, , usher in dorm housing for college kids.”
Such an announcement swallows prevailing knowledge that workplace buildings are completed, so let’s dream up every kind of cute methods to make them newly viable.
Yes, there’s a severe subject right here — together with the lack of tax income from fewer business property gross sales — however there’s a giant distinction between acknowledging {that a} vital downside exists and subscribing to an end-of-days financial and social nightmare.
The fact? Manhattan workplace buildings are on common about 60% full in contrast with 2019, in line with nearly each main business landlord. Yet their buildings aren’t counted within the discredited Kastle Systems “Back to Work Barometer, which “New York York” cites as gospel fact.
In truth, as The Post has reported, Kastle measures solely buildings — a lot of them so-called “Class-B” properties — that pay to make use of the corporate’s safety system. That leaves out 9 of the town’s 10 largest business landlords, whose tenants are the foremost financial-service corporations and legislation companies with the very best every day attendances. Entirely lacking are the most important homeowners, corresponding to SL Green, Vornado, Related Companies, Rudin Management and Rockefeller Group.
Nor does it rely towers owned by corporations that occupy them, corresponding to Morgan Stanley, a few of that are virtually 100% full all week.
To the extent some workplace areas are in bother, the mayor and governor’s brainstorms to sort out the issue replicate every thing fallacious with immediately’s auto-averse city orthodoxies.
More “plazas” round Grand Central? There are already a slew of them — corresponding to the big new one adjoining to the One Vanderbilt tower between East forty second and 43d streets, and the one adjoining to the Park Avenue viaduct.
Even if the Department of Transportation have been to ram one more down our throats, do the mayor and governor imagine they’d be sufficient to entice suburbanites again to their two-hour commutes after working at house for practically three years?
As for automating trash assortment: How about getting the Sanitation Department to do a greater job than the one it does now, which has left streets filthier with uncollected rubbish than they have been underneath Mayor Bill de Blasio? Or eliminating the outdoor-dining sheds which make the Big Apple one large feast for rodents?
For positive, Adams and Hochul mentioned some promising issues in regards to the mayor’s dreamed-of “metropolis of sure.” Hochul acknowledged that the town is over-regulated and limitations are prohibitively excessive to remodeling out of date workplace buildings into residences. But who doesn’t know that?
Both politicians name for a safer metropolis — the necessity for which is the real impediment to full financial restoration. Adams publicly laments the injury brought on by so-called “bail reform,” district attorneys who act extra like public defenders and turn-’em-loose judges. Hochul’s dedication is quite a bit softer, if it exists in any respect.
The mayor should coax or cajole her into what she must do — stand as much as Albany legislators who appear to get pleasure from watching law-abiding residents squirm as gang members, muggers and violent crazies flip the streets lawless. Only then will we’ve got a “New New York” that’s worthy of the title.
